URL vs. non-URL enocding

Will,

Thanks so much for your thoughtful response. I came across the issue because I was using htmlpurifier and it converted my links to proper URL coding; I agree that it's tougher to read, but I can't imagine why someone would want to edit the link in the html as opposed to just going back to the super cool WYSIWIG editor. Along the same theme, htmlpurifier wreaks havoc on my equations with "<" and ">" symbols to prevent attacks (it zaps them!). From a security standpoint, might it prudent, regardless of whether you add the url encoded option, to encode these two potentially dangerous characters on the Codecog side of things?

On another note, I'm in the process of beta testing a website (that I think I may have mentioned to you in an email many months ago), called www.myalgebrabook.com. I use Codecogs as the math coding both within the online book in addition to my TinyMCE integration which allows people to add practice algebra questions to my database. After beta testing (it should be fully ready by December), I plan on purchasing the yearly license from Codecogs, as I look forward to a long term use of the site.

Keep up the good work!

-Eric Kean author/creator www.myalgebrabook.com